In attempting to escape from the clutches of heroic leadership we now seem enthralled by its apparent opposite-distributed leadership: in this post-heroic era we will all be leaders so that none are. This essay suggests that we need to reconsider the nature of leadership if we are to assess alternatives and a critical aspect is its relationship to the sacred. I suggest that the sacred nature of leadership is not so much the elephant in the room but the room itself-the space that allows leadership to work. Leadership embodies three elements of the sacred: the separation between leaders and followers, the sacrifice of leaders and followers, and the way leaders silence the anxiety and resistance of followers. The essay concludes that non-sacred governance systems are plausible but that the effort and responsibility required would politicize the private sphere and render radical alternatives-non-sacred leadership-only viable for short-term, small scale organizations. We need therefore to find ways of engaging with, rather than seeking to avoid, the sacred nature of leadership. © The Author(s), 2010.
CITATION STYLE
Grint, K. (2010). The sacred in leadership: Separation, sacrifice and silence. Organization Studies, 31(1), 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840609347054
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.