This paper examines how behavioral biases caused by salient events affect the government provision of public goods. We develop a theory in which competing communities lobby the government for allocations of a local public good. Salient events bias community demands for the good, which results in inefficient allocations. We empirically test this theory using salient wildfires and government projects to reduce wildfire risk. Wildfires reduce risk to nearby communities, but may increase demand for fuels management projects because of biases induced by salient wildfires. We find that communities experiencing recent nearby fires are more likely to receive fuels management projects. (JEL D03, H41, Q24).
CITATION STYLE
Wibbenmeyer, M., Anderson, S. E., & Plantinga, A. J. (2019). SALIENCE AND THE GOVERNMENT PROVISION OF PUBLIC GOODS. Economic Inquiry, 57(3), 1547–1567. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12781
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.