Sarcopenia ≠ dynapenia

670Citations
Citations of this article
751Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Maximal voluntary force (strength) production declines with age and contributes to physical dependence and mortality. Consequently, a great deal of research has focused on identifying strategies to maintain muscle mass during the aging process and elucidating key molecular pathways of atrophy, with the rationale that the loss of strength is primarily a direct result of the age-associated declines in mass (sarcopenia). However, recent evidence questions this relationship and in this Green Banana article we argue the role of sarcopenia in mediating the age-associated loss of strength (which we will coin as dynapenia) does not deserve the attention it has attracted in both the scientific literature and popular press. Rather, we propose that alternative mechanisms underlie dynapenia (i.e., alterations in contractile properties or neurologic function), and urge that greater attention be paid to these variables in determining their role in dynapenia. Copyright 2008 by The Gerontological Society of America.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clark, B. C., & Manini, T. M. (2008). Sarcopenia ≠ dynapenia. Journals of Gerontology - Series A Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences. Gerontological Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/63.8.829

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free