Screening the retention of thirteen pesticides in a small constructed wetland

  • Braskerud B
  • Haarstad K
  • 28


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 43


    Citations of this article.


When pesticides are used in arable watersheds, residues are usually found in the recipients. However, small constructed wetlands (CWs) in first and second order streams can reduce the loss of pesticides, since water purification processes are stimulated. This paper presents the results of adding 13 pesticides to a CW in Norway. The relative retention increased between 0 and 67% for the pesticides fluroxypyr, bentazone, dicamba, mecoprop, propiconazole, MCPA, dichlorprop, linuron, fenpropimorph, metalaxyl, metribuzin, metamitron and propachlor. In many cases, the CW reduced the peak concentrations to values regarded as non-toxic for aquatic life, even though the wetland covered less than 0.4% of the watershed surface area, and the average hydraulic load often was above 0.8 m d–1. Possible retention factors were adsorption to soil particles and organic matter, sedimentation of particles, low or high redoxpotential, and biodegradation of nitrogen-rich pesticides. However, the retention processes are complex, and are not fully understood.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Constructed wetland
  • Diffuse pollution
  • Fungicide
  • Herbicide

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

  • SGR: 0242637031
  • PUI: 37368942
  • SCOPUS: 2-s2.0-0242637031
  • ISBN: 0273-1223
  • ISSN: 02731223
  • PMID: 14621173


Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free