Screening the retention of thirteen pesticides in a small constructed wetland

50Citations
Citations of this article
45Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

When pesticides are used in arable watersheds, residues are usually found in the recipients. However, small constructed wetlands (CWs) in first and second order streams can reduce the loss of pesticides, since water purification processes are stimulated. This paper presents the results of adding 13 pesticides to a CW in Norway. The relative retention increased between 0 and 67% for the pesticides fluroxypyr, bentazone, dicamba, mecoprop, propiconazole, MCPA, dichlorprop, linuron, fenpropimorph, metalaxyl, metribuzin, metamitron and propachlor. In many cases, the CW reduced the peak concentrations to values regarded as non-toxic for aquatic life, even though the wetland covered less than 0.4% of the watershed surface area, and the average hydraulic load often was above 0.8 m d-1. Possible retention factors were adsorption to soil particles and organic matter, sedimentation of particles, low or high redox-potential, and biodegradation of nitrogen-rich pesticides. However, the retention processes are complex, and are not fully understood.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Braskerud, B. C., & Haarstad, K. (2003). Screening the retention of thirteen pesticides in a small constructed wetland. In Water Science and Technology (Vol. 48, pp. 267–274). IWA Publishing. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2003.0332

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free