The process of European integration, it is generally argued, has led to a transfer of legislative power not only from the national to the European level, but also, and more importantly, from parliament to the executive. As a consequence, democratically elected institutions at the national level are often bypassed in the decision-making process. The current financial and debt crisis seems to reinforce this trend: budgetary authority – a key prerogative of parliaments – is increasingly subject to influence from EU institutions both within and outside the EU legal framework. To assess whether andto what extent the crisis has indeed led to a further de-parliamentarisation, this paper will analyse how national parliaments have responded to the crisis. Detailed empirical data reveals a very uneven participation of parliaments in the management of the crisis, in terms both of formal rights and of their involvement in practice. As a result, the crisis reinforces the gap between stronger and weaker parliaments, possibly leading to the dangerous development of ‘second class’ parliaments in the EU.
CITATION STYLE
Auel, K., & Höing, O. (2014). Scrutiny in Challenging Times: National Parliaments in the Eurozone Crisis. Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies (SIEPS), …, (1), 1–16. Retrieved from http://www.sieps.se/sites/default/files/2014_1epa_A4.pdf
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.