A second failure to replicate the Gottman et al. (1995) Typology of men who abuse intimate partners. . .and Possible reasons why

52Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The present study attempts to replicate Gottman et al.'s (1995; Jacobson & Gottman, 1998) psychophysiological study that classifies partner assaultive men into two distinct groups: heart rate (HR) decelerators (Type 1 batterers) and HR accelerators (Type 2 batterers). Current results indicate no significant differences between Type 1 and Type 2 batterers on the antisocial spectrum of behaviors. Resting HR, rather than HR change, was negatively related to the antisocial spectrum of behavior for batterers with severe, clinical levels of violence only. Reasons for subsequent failures to replicate the Type 1 versus Type 2 distinctions may be attributable to unusually high autonomic arousal during baseline in the original study. Consideration of resting HR and the use of dimensional as opposed to categorical approaches in analyzing the heterogeneity of batterers are proposed as possible solutions to clarifying inconsistencies across laboratories.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Babcock, J. C., Green, C. E., Webb, S. A., & Graham, K. H. (2004). A second failure to replicate the Gottman et al. (1995) Typology of men who abuse intimate partners. . .and Possible reasons why. Journal of Family Psychology, 18(2), 396–400. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.18.2.396

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free