(Self) Regulating war?: Voluntary regulation and the private security industry

21Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Private security companies' growing participation in U.S. and international military missions has raised concern about whether the private security industry is subject to sufficient controls. Industry self-regulation is often proposed as part of a multilayered framework of regulations to govern PSCs. But what can self-regulation contribute to regulation of the private security industry? This matters because privatization in the security realm has moved beyond understandings of the proper breakdown of public and private functions concerning the use of force. This article assesses what self-regulation can contribute to the control of this industry and whether the private security industry lends itself to effective self-regulation. It concludes that the private security industry does not exhibit the capacity to adopt and implement effective self-regulation on its own. If self-regulation is to complement state and international regulation, participation in the design and oversight of self-regulation must be broadened beyond private security companies alone. © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Nevers, R. (2009). (Self) Regulating war?: Voluntary regulation and the private security industry. Security Studies, 18(3), 479–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/09636410903132854

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free