On the social nature of objectivity: 1Helen Longino and Justin Biddle

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

According to Helen Longino, objectivity is necessarily social as it depends on critical interactions in community. Justin Biddle argues that Longino's account presupposes individuals that are completely open to any criticism; as such individuals are in principle able to criticise their beliefs on their own, Longino's account is not really social. In the first part of my paper I argue that even for completely open individuals, criticism for maintaining objectivity is only possible in community. In the second part I question Biddle's interpretation of Longino's conception of the individual. I conclude that objectivity as Longino describes it is necessarily social.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eigi, J. (2015). On the social nature of objectivity: 1Helen Longino and Justin Biddle. Theoria (Spain), 30(3), 449–463. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.13208

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free