Skip to content
Conference proceedings

Can social reference management systems predict a ranking of scholarly venues?

Alhoori H, Furuta R ...see all

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), vol. 8092 LNCS (2013) pp. 138-143

  • 32

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 5

    Citations

    Citations of this article.
  • N/A

    Views

    ScienceDirect users who have downloaded this article.
Sign in to save reference

Abstract

New scholarly venues (e.g., conferences and journals) are emerging as research fields expand. Ranking these new venues is imperative to assist researchers, librarians, and research institutions. However, rankings based on traditional citation-based metrics have limitations and are no longer the only or the best choice to determine the impact of scholarly venues. Here, we propose a venue-ranking approach based on scholarly references from academic social media sites, and we compare a number of citation-based rankings with social-based rankings. Our preliminary results show a statistically significant correlation between the two approaches in a number of general rankings, research areas, and subdisciplines. Furthermore, we found that social-based rankings favor open-access venues over venues that require a subscription.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Altmetrics
  • Bibliometrics
  • Citation Analysis
  • Digital Libraries
  • Google Scholar Metrics
  • Impact Factor
  • Ranking
  • Readership
  • Scholarly Venues
  • Social Reference Management

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Authors

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below