Do the Standards Go Far Enough? Power, Policy, and Practice in Mathematics Education

  • Apple M
  • Education M
  • Nov N
  • 159


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A


    Citations of this article.


Although NCTM's Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics (1989) and Professional Standards for Teaching Mathematics (1991) are generating considerable interest, there has been little discussion of their ideological and social grounding and effects. By placing the Standards within the growing conservative movement in education, this paper raises a number of crucial issues about the documents, including the depth of the financial crisis in education and its economic and ideological genesis and results; the nature of inequality in schools; the role of mathematical knowledge in our economy in maintaining these inequalities; the possibilities and limitations of a mathematics curriculum that is more grounded in students' experiences; and the complicated realities of teachers' lives. Without a deeper understanding of these issues, the Standards will be used in ways that largely lend support only to the conservative agenda for educational reform.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Michael W. Apple

  • Mathematics Education

  • No Nov

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free