Task Integration in Multimodal Speech Recognition Environments

  • Grasso M
  • Finin T
  • 4


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A


    Citations of this article.


A model of complementary behavior has been proposed based on arguments that direct manipulation and speech recognition interfaces have reciprocal strengths and weaknesses. This suggests that user interface performance and acceptance may increase by adopting a multimodal approach that combines speech and direct manipulation. More theoretical work is needed in order to understand how to leverage this advantage. In this paper, a framework is presented to empirically evaluate the types of tasks that might benefit from such a multimodal interface

Author-supplied keywords

  • A
  • acceptance
  • argument
  • behavior
  • benefit
  • direct manipulation
  • environment
  • framework
  • integration
  • interface
  • interfaces
  • manipulation
  • model
  • paper
  • performance
  • recognition
  • speech
  • speech recognition
  • speech-recognition
  • strength
  • suggest
  • tasks
  • theoretical
  • type
  • user
  • user interface
  • weaknesses
  • work

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • M A Grasso

  • T W Finin

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free