Thinking about change for development practice: A case study from Oxfam GB

  • Eyben R
  • Kidder T
  • Rowlands J
 et al. 
  • 67

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 19

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Development practice is informed by theories of change, but indiEyben, R., Kidder, T., Rowlands, J., & Bronstein, A. (2008). Thinking about change for development practice: a case study from Oxfam GB. Development in Practice, 18(2), 201–212. JOUR. http://doi.org/10.1080/09614520801898996viduals and organisations may not make them explicit. Practitioners may be unaware of the extent to which strategic choices and debates are informed by disparate thinking about how history happens and the role of purposeful intervention for progressive social change. In the past few years, some Oxfam GB staff have been creating processes to debate their theories of change as part of an effort to improve practice. In this context, the authors introduce four sets of ideas about change, with a discussion of how they have been explored in two instances, and some of the challenges emerging from this process. Through explicitly debating theories of change, organisational decision-making processes can be better informed and strategic choices made more transparent.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Aid
  • Civil society
  • Methods
  • Western Europe

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Rosalind Eyben

  • Thalia Kidder

  • Jo Rowlands

  • Audrey Bronstein

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free