Three Scenarios for the Future of Technology and Strong Democracy

  • Barber B
148Citations
Citations of this article
123Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A theoretical discussion of the impact of communication technology on democracy. The implementation of technology must be guided by a clear deliberate vision of democracy. Sketches three scenarios regarding the role of technology in relation to democracy: 1. Panglossian - technology is left to market forces; privatizes democracies and increases polarization; cheapens culture; 2. Pandora - Even worse; IT enables the establishment of a political or economic tyranny (a la 1984); 3. Jeffersonian - a clear vision of deliberative democracy will lead to the strengthening of society by harnessing information technology to educate individuals as smart citizens and not as unthinking automatons participating in mass plebescites. Literature: 1. McChesney; 2. Fishkin; 3. Sunsteen Key Quote: "For technology remains a tool allied to particular conceptions of democracy; if we know what kind of democracy we want, it can enhance civic communication and expand citizen literacy. Left to markets...it is likely to augment McWorld's least worthy imperatives, including surveillance over manipulation of opinion, and the cultivation of artificial needs rooted in lifestyle 'choices' unconnected to real economic, civic, or spiritual needs" (588).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barber, B. R. (1998). Three Scenarios for the Future of Technology and Strong Democracy. Political Science Quarterly, 113(4), 573–589. https://doi.org/10.2307/2658245

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free