Tracking implementation and (un)intended consequences: A process evaluation of an innovative peripheral health facility financing mechanism in Kenya

  • Waweru E
  • Goodman C
  • Kedenge S
 et al. 
  • 65

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 3

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

In many African countries, user fees have failed to achieve intended access and quality of care im-provements. Subsequent user fee reduction or elimination policies have often been poorly planned, without alternative sources of income for facilities. We describe early implementation of an innova-tive national health financing intervention in Kenya; the health sector services fund (HSSF). In HSSF, central funds are credited directly into a facility's bank account quarterly, and facility funds are man-aged by health facility management committees (HFMCs) including community representatives. HSSF is therefore a finance mechanism with potential to increase access to funds for peripheral facili-ties, support user fee reduction and improve equity in access. We conducted a process evaluation of HSSF implementation based on a theory of change underpinning the intervention. Methods included interviews at national, district and facility levels, facility record reviews, a structured exit survey and a document review. We found impressive achievements: HSSF funds were reaching facilities; funds were being overseen and used in a way that strengthened transparency and community involve-ment; and health workers' motivation and patient satisfaction improved. Challenges or unintended outcomes included: complex and centralized accounting requirements undermining efficiency; inter-actions between HSSF and user fees leading to difficulties in accessing crucial user fee funds; and some relationship problems between key players. Although user fees charged had not increased, na-tional reduction policies were still not being adhered to. Finance mechanisms can have a strong posi-tive impact on peripheral facilities, and HFMCs can play a valuable role in managing facilities. Although fiduciary oversight is essential, mechanisms should allow for local decision-making and en-sure that unmanageable paperwork is avoided. There are also limits to what can be achieved with relatively small funds in contexts of enormous need. Process evaluations tracking (un)intended con-sequences of interventions can contribute to regional financing and decentralization debates.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Accountability
  • Africa
  • Community involvement
  • Decentralization
  • Peripheral facility financing
  • Quality of care
  • Relationships
  • User fee removal

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Authors

  • Evelyn WaweruCentre for Geographic Medicine Research Coast

    Follow
  • Catherine Goodman

  • Sarah Kedenge

  • Benjamin Tsofa

  • Sassy Molyneux

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free