Triangulation in Qualitative Research: Evaluation of Completeness and Confirmation Purposes

124Citations
Citations of this article
143Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The term triangulation has been applied to research strategies intended to serve two distinct purposes, confirmation and completeness. Many researchers who claim to have used a triangulated approach fail to provide evidence to show that their approach contributed to either confirmation or completeness of the data set. This paper reviews these distinct purposes and describes how triangulation of qualitative and quantitative methods was built into a study to achieve them. Analysis of data related to a single construct illustrates how data generated by qualitative and quantitative methods can provide both convergent validity and a broader understanding of one's subject matter. Copyright © 1993, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Breitmayer, B. J., Ayres, L., & Knafl, K. A. (1993). Triangulation in Qualitative Research: Evaluation of Completeness and Confirmation Purposes. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 25(3), 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1993.tb00788.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free