On under-determination in cosmology

28Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

I discuss how modern cosmology illustrates under-determination of theoretical hypotheses by data, in ways that are different from most philosophical discussions. I emphasise cosmology's concern with what data could in principle be collected by a single observer (Section 2); and I give a broadly sceptical discussion of cosmology's appeal to the cosmological principle as a way of breaking the under-determination (Section 3).I confine most of the discussion to the history of the observable universe from about one second after the Big Bang, as described by the mainstream cosmological model: in effect, what cosmologists in the early 1970s dubbed the 'standard model', as elaborated since then. But in the closing Section 4, I broach some questions about times earlier than one second. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Butterfield, J. (2014). On under-determination in cosmology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B - Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 46(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.06.003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free