Skip to content
Journal article

Unipolarity: A Structural Perspective

Jervis R...(+1 more)

World Politics, vol. 61, issue 1 (2009) pp. 188-213

  • 67

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 2

    Citations

    Citations of this article.
  • N/A

    Views

    ScienceDirect users who have downloaded this article.
Sign in to save reference

Abstract

To say that the world is now unipolar is neither to praise American power, let alone its leadership, nor to accuse the United States of having established a worldwide empire. It is to state a fact, but on whose meaning is far from clear, as we have neither a powerful theory nor much evidence about how unipolar systems operate. A central diffi- culty for sorting this out entails determining the extent to which behav ior and outcomes we have seen stem from structure, rather than from other levels of analysis, such as idiosyncratic aspects of the internationa environment, the American domestic system, and the role of individu leaders. How might the system function if the unipole were Nazi Ger- many, Stalin's USSR (or Brezhnev s), or a traditional autocracy? Or if i were the United States in a different era? There would surely be major differences, but we should still start our analysis with structure. In fact this takes us quite far and, as well, to some unexpected places. Realism indicates that the unipole is likely to be difficult to restrain, no matter how benign its intentions or domestic regime. Furthermore, it is far from clear that it should seek to maintain existing arrangements. Both normal ambitions and, in the current context, American values and be liefs may lead the superpower to seek to change the system rather than preserve it.

Find this document

Get full text

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below