The validity of the economic value added approach: An empirical application

56Citations
Citations of this article
142Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This study investigates the relative explanatory power of the Economic Value Added (EVA) model with respect to stock returns and firms' market value, compared to established accounting variables (e.g. net income, operating income), in the context of a small European developing market, namely the Athens Stock Exchange, in its first market-wide application of the EVA measure. Relative information content tests reveal that net and operating income appear to be more value relevant than EVA. Additionally, incremental information tests suggest that EVA unique components add only marginally to the information content of accounting profit. Moreover, EVA does not appear to have a stronger correlation with firms' Market Value Added than the other variables, suggesting that - for our Greek dataset - EVA, even though useful as a performance evaluation tool, need not necessarily be more correlated with shareholder's value than established accounting variables. © 2007 The Authors Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kyriazis, D., & Anastassis, C. (2007). The validity of the economic value added approach: An empirical application. European Financial Management, 13(1), 71–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-036X.2006.00286.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free