West Pharmaceutical's explosion: Structuring crisis discourse knowledge

36Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A crisis can place an organization and its stakeholders at risk for significant losses. Crisis management has emerged as a means to reduce those losses. Crisis response strategies, what the organization says and does after a crisis, are critical resources in crisis management. It is not surprising that crisis response has emerged as a vibrant research area. The focus of crisis response research is on protecting and repairing the organizational reputational-how stakeholders perceive the organization [Benoit, W. L. (1995). Accounts, excuses, and apologies: A theory of image restoration. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press; Hearit, K. M. (2001). Corporate apologia: When an organization speaks in defense of itself. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), Handbook of public relations (pp. 501-511). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage). This article synthesizes information from various writings on crisis response to create the Crisis Communication Standards, a set of guidelines for crisis managers looking to protect their reputational assets. The first section briefly outlines the Crisis Communication standards and the second section illustrates its application using the West Pharmaceuticals explosion. © 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Coombs, W. T. (2004). West Pharmaceutical’s explosion: Structuring crisis discourse knowledge. Public Relations Review, 30(4), 467–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2004.08.007

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free