Wintertime for deceptive advertising?

18Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Casual empiricism suggests that deceptive advertising about product quality is prevalent, and several classes of theories explore its causes and consequences. We provide unusually sharp empirical evidence on its extent, mechanics, and dynamics. Ski resorts self-report substantially more natural snowfall than comparable government sources. The difference is more pronounced on weekends, despite third-party evidence that snowfall is uniform throughout the week-as one would expect given plausibly greater returns to exaggeration on weekends. Exaggeration is greater for resorts that plausibly reap greater benefits from it: those with expert terrain and those not offering money back guarantees.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zinman, J., & Zitzewitz, E. (2016). Wintertime for deceptive advertising? American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 8(1), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20130346

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free