Writing science and objectification: Selecting, organizing, and decontextualing knowledge

15Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This analysis focuses on two writing activities required by a middle school science curriculum unit to demonstrate how particular forms of writing guide students to frame their knowledge in important ways. Following the completion of charts and 'Think and Write' questions related to a single scientific phenomenon, I trace how students identify the phenomenon first as a little red, then call it rust, and later adopt the scientific term iron oxide and formula, Fe2O3, in writing. While these written forms appear to be objective, this analysis takes a situated approach to interaction and shows how students are socialized to these more sophisticated written forms through practices such as selecting, organizing, renaming, and repackaging experiences from laboratory activities and discussion. This interactive perspective illustrates the very social nature of writing, as well as the importance of social interaction in helping students come to identify and appropriate valued forms of scientific language. © 2008 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wright, L. J. (2008). Writing science and objectification: Selecting, organizing, and decontextualing knowledge. Linguistics and Education, 19(3), 265–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2008.06.004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free