Bayesian model selection and averaging in additive and proportional hazards models

27Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Although Cox proportional hazards regression is the default analysis for time to event data, there is typically uncertainty about whether the effects of a predictor are more appropriately characterized by a multiplicative or additive model. To accommodate this uncertainty, we place a model selection prior on the coefficients in an additive-multiplicative hazards model. This prior assigns positive probability, not only to the model that has both additive and multiplicative effects for each predictor, but also to sub-models corresponding to no association, to only additive effects, and to only proportional effects. The additive component of the model is constrained to ensure non-negative hazards, a condition often violated by current methods. After augmenting the data with Poisson latent variables, the prior is conditionally conjugate, and posterior computation can proceed via an efficient Gibbs sampling algorithm. Simulation study results are presented, and the methodology is illustrated using data from the Framingham heart study. © 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dunson, D. B., & Herring, A. H. (2005). Bayesian model selection and averaging in additive and proportional hazards models. Lifetime Data Analysis, 11(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-004-0384-x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free