Durometer hardness and the stress-strain behavior of elastomeric materials

133Citations
Citations of this article
163Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The Durometer hardness test is one of the most commonly used measurements to qualitatively assess and compare the mechanical behavior of elastomeric and elastomeric-like materials. This paper presents nonlinear finite element simulations of hardness tests which act to provide a mapping of measured Durometer Shore A and D values to the stress-strain behavior of elastomers. In the simulations, the nonlinear stress-strain behavior of the elastomers is first represented using the Gaussian (neo-Hookean) constitutive model. The predictive capability of the simulations is verified by comparison of calculated conversions of Shore A to Shore D values with the guideline conversion chart in ASTM D2240. The simulation results are then used to determine the relationship between the neo-Hookean elastic modulus and Shore A and Shore D values. The simulation results show the elastomer to undergo locally large deformations during hardness testing. In order to assess the potential role of the limiting extensibility of the elastomer on the hardness measurement, simulations are conducted where the elastomer is represented by the non-Gaussian Arruda-Boyce constitutive model. The limiting extensibility is found to predict a higher hardness value for a material with a given initial modulus. This effect is pronounced as the limiting extensibility decreases to less than 5 and eliminates the one-to-one mapping of hardness to modulus. However, the durometer hardness test still can be used as a reasonable approximation of the initial neo-Hookean modulus unless the limiting extensibility is known to be small as is the case in many materials, such as some elastomers and most soft biological tissues.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Qi, H. J., Joyce, K., & Boyce, M. C. (2003). Durometer hardness and the stress-strain behavior of elastomeric materials. Rubber Chemistry and Technology, 76(2), 419–435. https://doi.org/10.5254/1.3547752

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free