The extended role of the nurse - Opportunity or threat?

Abstract

Nursing practice is undergoing changes that are both exciting and controversial. The UKCC Scope of Professional Practice has encouraged nurses to re-evaluate their practice and, as a result, nurses from various fields have expanded their roles to meet the changing needs of patients and the profession. Published evidence shows that nurses can be as effective as doctors within these expanded roles, but that there is a danger that gender issues will cloud the debate because of the assumption that all nurses are female and all doctors are male. This problem is especially evident when female nurses perform an extended role involving male patients, although female doctors are in a similar position and work with the same patients without undue comment. The roles of doctors and nurses should complement each other, and all practitioners should work for the benefit of patients in their care, rather than defending traditional roles and hierarchy. There is confusion surrounding accountability of nurses who work in an extended role between the medical and the nursing profession, and both the Royal College of Nursing and the British Medical Association need to clarify the situation. This article looks at the arguments for and against the extended role of the nurse specialist and discusses current opinions within the nursing and medical fields. The article also describes how nurses at Midland Fertility Services have successfully extended their role to encompass ultrasound-guided oocyte retrieval and surgical sperm recovery.