Skip to content

The Ordinary Conception of Race in the United States and Its Relation to Racial Attitudes: A New Approach

by Joshua Glasgow, Julie L. Shulman, Enrique G. Covarrubias
Journal of Cognition and Culture ()
Get full text at journal

Abstract

Many hold that ordinary race-thinking in the USA is committed to the 'one-drop rule', that race is ordinarily represented in terms of essences, and that race is ordinarily represented as a biological (phenotype- and/or ancestry-based, non-social) kind. This study investigated the extent to which ordinary race-thinking subscribes to these commitments. It also investigated the relationship between different conceptions of race and racial attitudes. Participants included 449 USA adults who completed an Internet survey. Unlike previous research, conceptions of race were assessed using concrete vignettes. Results indicate widespread rejection of the one-drop rule, as well as the use of a complex combination of ancestral, phenotypic, and social (and, therefore, non-essentialist) criteria for racial classification. No relationship was found between racial attitudes and essentialism, the one-drop rule, or social race-thinking; however, ancestry-based and phenotype-based classification criteria were associated with racial attitudes. These results suggest a complicated relationship between conceptions of race and racial attitudes.

Cite this document (BETA)

Readership Statistics

9 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
 
67% Psychology
 
33% Social Sciences
by Academic Status
 
56% Student > Ph. D. Student
 
11% Lecturer > Senior Lecturer
 
11% Professor > Associate Professor
by Country
 
11% United States

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Sign up & Download

Already have an account? Sign in