Physiological Arousal and Political Beliefs

47Citations
Citations of this article
160Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

It is by now well known that political attitudes can be affected by emotions. Most earlier studies have focused on emotions generated by some political event (e.g., terrorism or increased immigration). However, the methods used in previous efforts have made it difficult to untangle the various causal pathways that might link emotions to political beliefs. In contrast, we focus on emotions incidental (i.e., irrelevant) to the decision process, allowing us to cleanly trace and estimate the effect of experimentally induced anxiety on political beliefs. Further, we build upon innovative new work that links physiological reactivity (Hatemi, McDermott, Eaves, Kendler, & Neale, 2013; Oxley etal., 2008a) to attitudes by using skin conductance reactivity as a measure of emotional arousal. We found that anxiety-generated by a video stimulus-significantly affected physiological arousal as measured by tonic skin-conductance levels, and that higher physiological reactivity predicted more anti-immigration attitudes. We show that physiological reactivity mediated the relationship between anxiety and political attitudes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Renshon, J., Lee, J. J., & Tingley, D. (2015). Physiological Arousal and Political Beliefs. Political Psychology, 36(5), 569–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12173

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free