This commentary reviews the status that the articles in this special issue accord to the data which they analyse. Consideration is given to the benefits of adopting a pluralist interpretative approach within qualitative research on anomalous experiences, that is, applying different methodological approaches and epistemological, ontological, and theoretical positions to the same data. This analytic stance is illustrated with reference to data from the articles, and the challenges associated with it are noted. © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
CITATION STYLE
Coyle, A. (2010). Qualitative research and anomalous experience: A call for interpretative pluralism. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 7(1), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880903304600
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.