An unbearable lightness?

3Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article considers various notions of ‘beauty’ and how these have informed the creative and critical processes of graphic design, specifically typography. The author considers how the Renaissance revival of Greek mathematics to support a ‘universal beauty’ was gradually unpicked by Enlightenment thinkers such as Descartes, Kant and Hume, and how this process has subsequently shaped modernist and postmodernist attitudes towards ‘beauty’. From our current vantage point it could be argued that ‘beauty’ should now be considered a redundant concept; however, design schools and studios continue to make value judgements dividing the ‘beautiful’ from the ‘ugly’. On what basis are these judgements made and are they still valid in a pluralistic society? Is it possible that we now have a new sensibility, a different notion of beauty? Reflecting upon important questions raised by the American designer and writer Steven Heller in his controversial essay ‘The Cult of the Ugly’ in Eye magazine in 1993, the author proposes that 14 years on from the article, we can indeed witness a new aesthetic sensibility, shared but not universal, rooted in loss yet also ‘found’. © 2007, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rigley, S. (2007). An unbearable lightness? Visual Communication, 6(3), 281–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357207081001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free