Sign up & Download
Sign in

Bystander intervention in emergencies: diffusion of responsibility.

by J M Darley, B Latané
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology ()

Abstract

COLLEGE SS OVERHEARD AN EPILEPTIC SIEZURE. THEY BELIEVED EITHER THAT THEY ALONE HEARD THE EMERGENCY, OR THAT 1 OR 4 UNSEEN OTHERS WERE ALSO PRESENT. AS PREDICTED, THE PRESENCE OF OTHER BYSTANDERS REDUCED THE INDIVIDUAL'S FEELINGS OF PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY AND LOWERED HIS SPEED OF REPORTING (P < .01). IN GROUPS OF 3, MALES REPORTED NO FASTER THAN FEMALES, AND FEMALES REPORTED NO SLOWER WHEN THE 1 OTHER BYSTANDER WAS A MALE RATHER THAN A FEMALE. IN GENERAL, PERSONALITY AND BACKGROUND MEASURES WERE NOT PREDICTIVE OF HELPING. BYSTANDER INACTION IN REAL LIFE EMERGENCIES IS OFTEN EXPLAINED BY APATHY, ALIENATION, AND ANOMIE. RESULTS SUGGEST THAT THE EXPLANATION MAY LIE IN THE BYSTANDER'S RESPONSE TO OTHER OS THAN IN HIS INDIFFERENCE TO THE VICTIM. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2010 APA, all rights reserved)

Cite this document (BETA)

Available from doi.apa.org
Page 1
hidden

Bystander intervention in emergen...

Plain text is unavailable for this page.
Page 2
hidden
Plain text is unavailable for this page.

Readership Statistics

146 Readers on Mendeley
by Discipline
 
 
 
by Academic Status
 
36% Ph.D. Student
 
15% Student (Bachelor)
 
11% Doctoral Student
by Country
 
56% United States
 
13% United Kingdom
 
4% Canada

Sign up today - FREE

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research. Learn more

  • All your research in one place
  • Add and import papers easily
  • Access it anywhere, anytime

Start using Mendeley in seconds!

Already have an account? Sign in