The CALBC silver standard corpus-: Harmonizing multiple semantic annotations in a large biomedical corpus

3Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The CALBC initiative aims to provide a large-scale biomedical text corpus that contains semantic annotations for tagged named entities of different kinds. The generation of this corpus requires that the annotations from different automatic annotation systems are harmonized. In the first phase, the annotation systems from 5 participants (EMBL-EBI, EMC Rotterdam, NLM, JULIE Lab Jena, and Linguamatics) were gathered. All annotations were delivered in a common annotation format that included concept ids in the boundary assignments and that enabled comparison and alignment of the results. During the harmonization phase, the produced results from different systems have been integrated into a single harmonised corpus (“silver standard” corpus) by applying a voting scheme. We give an overview of the processed data and the principles of harmonization - formal boundary reconciliation and semantic matching of named entities. Finally all submissions of the participants have been evaluated against the silver standard corpus. We found that species and disease annotations are better standardised amongst the partners than the annotations of genes and proteins. The raw corpus is now available for additional named entity annotations. Part of the annotated corpus will be made available later for a public challenge. We expect that we can improve corpus building activities both in terms of the numbers of named entity classes being covered, as well as the size of the corpus in terms of annotated documents.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rebholz-Schuhmann, D., Yepes, A. J. J., Milward, D., Corbett, P., van Mulligen, E. M., Kang, N., … Hahn, U. (2009). The CALBC silver standard corpus-: Harmonizing multiple semantic annotations in a large biomedical corpus. In 3rd International Symposium on Languages in Biology and Medicine, LBM 2009 (pp. 64–72). Korean Institute of Information Scientists and Engineers.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free