A Comparison of Frameworks, Theories, and Models of Policy Processes

120Citations
Citations of this article
307Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The striking diversity of approaches developed and used by top policy scholars raises questions concerning the meaning of “the policymaking process.” This chapter explains Elinor Ostrom’s argument to heart and utilizes the frameworks, theories, and models approach in two ways. They are: as a useful tool to make consistent comparisons among the models, theories, and frameworks; explores how and whether the models can inform and contribute to the theories, and in turn whether the theories may be placed within either one of the two frameworks found in this collection. Theories place values on some of the variables identified as important in a framework, posit relationships among the variables, and make predictions about likely outcomes. The theories appearing in this volume may be sorted into two groups: common-pool resource theory and the others. Common-pool resource theory explains the conditions that support self-governance on the part of citizens.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schlager, E. (2019). A Comparison of Frameworks, Theories, and Models of Policy Processes. In Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 293–319). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367274689-10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free