Context, strategy and financial participation: A comparative analysis

33Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article investigates where financial participation is most likely to be encountered, and explores its compatibility with collective forms of employee voice. It is based on the findings of a major international survey of human resource management (HRM) practices. We found that financial participation was not affected by collective employee voice, but that national context and associated HRM strategies had significant effects on its nature and extent. As financial participation is likely to make for greater variation in wage rates, it tends to weaken industry-level bargaining. By re-casting the fundamental determinants of wages, it is also likely to facilitate greater wage dispersion within the firm. Hence, it was found that financial participation is more commonly encountered in liberal market contexts, and in firms practising calculative HRM, where countervailing employee power is weak, whether or not collective bargaining is formally present. © The Author(s) 2010.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Croucher, R., Brookes, M., Wood, G., & Brewster, C. (2010). Context, strategy and financial participation: A comparative analysis. Human Relations, 63(6), 835–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726709343654

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free