Download vs. citation vs. readership data: The case of an information systems journal

24Citations
Citations of this article
93Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In our article we compare downloads from ScienceDirect, citations from Scopus and readership data from the social reference management system Mendeley for articles from the Journal of Strategic Information Systems (publication years: 2002-2011). Our study shows a medium to high correlation between downloads and readership data (Spearman r=0.73) and between downloads and citations (Spearman r=0.77). However, there is only a medium-sized correlation between readership data and citations (Spearman r=0.51). These results suggest that there is at least "some" difference among the two usage measures and the (citation) impact of the analysed information systems articles. As expected downloads and citations have different obsolescence characteristics. While the highest downloads accrue the first years after publication, it takes several years until the citation maximum is reached. © AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH Vienna 2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schlögl, C., Gorraiz, J., Gumpenberger, C., Jack, K., & Kraker, P. (2013). Download vs. citation vs. readership data: The case of an information systems journal. In Proceedings of ISSI 2013 - 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference (Vol. 1, p. 626).

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free