From EBM to EBL: Two steps forward or one step back?

31Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The author employs his vantage point as a contributor to Evidence-based Medicine (EBM) and Evidence-based Librarianship (EBL) in the United Kingdom to anticipate obstacles to be overcome by the emerging EBL paradigm. After reviewing and synthesizing three proto-definitions of EBL, he discusses issues around the potential domains to be populated by research findings. He then briefly considers the contribution that critical appraisal skills can make to an evidence-based profession. In concluding that “evidence-based librarianship” is a selflimiting “label,” he encourages health information professionals instead to promote the contribution of librarianship to evidence-based practice, a role for which they are uniquely qualified. © 2002 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Booth, A. (2002). From EBM to EBL: Two steps forward or one step back? Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 21(3), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1300/J115v21n03_04

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free