Abstract
Scientists have evolved a unit of communication to describe their new results and findings: the peer-reviewed scientific paper. The internet is full of erroneous and even dangerous information that is difficult for people without a scientific education or training to interpret in context, particularly given the uncertainties inherent in the scientific process. Those interpreting science for the public, whether journalists, educators or other communicators, should use peer review as a benchmark. © Inter-Research 2008.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Clarke, M. (2008, December 3). Ethics of science communication on the web. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics. https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00096
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.