Ethics of science communication on the web

5Citations
Citations of this article
52Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Scientists have evolved a unit of communication to describe their new results and findings: the peer-reviewed scientific paper. The internet is full of erroneous and even dangerous information that is difficult for people without a scientific education or training to interpret in context, particularly given the uncertainties inherent in the scientific process. Those interpreting science for the public, whether journalists, educators or other communicators, should use peer review as a benchmark. © Inter-Research 2008.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Clarke, M. (2008, December 3). Ethics of science communication on the web. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics. https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00096

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free