A further examination of the export-led growth hypothesis

74Citations
Citations of this article
105Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article challenges the common view that exports generally contribute more to GDP growth than a pure change in export volume, as the export-led growth hypothesis predicts. Applying panel cointegration techniques to a production function with non-export GDP as the dependent variable, we find for a sample of 45 developing countries that: (i) exports have a positive short-run effect on non-export GDP and vice versa (short-run bidirectional causality), (ii) the long-run effect of exports on non-export output, however, is negative on average, but (iii) there are large differences in the long-run effect of exports on non-export GDP across countries. Cross-sectional regressions indicate that these cross-country differences in the long-run effect of exports on non-export GDP are significantly negatively related to cross-country differences in primary export dependence and business and labor market regulation. In contrast, there is no significant association between the growth effect of exports and the capacity of a country to absorb new knowledge. © 2012 Springer-Verlag.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dreger, C., & Herzer, D. (2013). A further examination of the export-led growth hypothesis. Empirical Economics, 45(1), 39–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-012-0602-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free