Gender and Negotiator Competitiveness: A Meta-analysis

252Citations
Citations of this article
216Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Although there have been numerous investigations into the relationship between gender and bargaining competitiveness over the past several decades, few conclusions have been reached. The results of 62 research reports on the relationship between gender and competitive behavior in dyadic bargaining interactions were examined by meta-analytic review. The average weighted effect size indicated that women appear to behave more cooperatively in negotiations than men, but this difference is slight. Results suggest that constraints on negotiators (imposed by abstract bargaining paradigms and restrictions on communication) lessen gender differences in negotiation behavior. Women were significantly more competitive than men when competing against an opponent who pursued a "tit-for-tat" bargaining strategy. © 1998 Academic Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Walters, A. E., Stuhlmacher, A. F., & Meyer, L. L. (1998). Gender and Negotiator Competitiveness: A Meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2797

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free