Journal Article

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False: Problems in the Analysis

  • Steven G
  • Sander G
PLoS Medicine (2007) 4(4) 0019-0025
ISSN: 15491277
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Singh and colleagues discuss the threat to regional and global public health posed by XDR-TB in KwaZulu-Natal, and propose new measures to control the outbreak.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Steven, G., & Sander, G. (2007). Why Most Published Research Findings Are False: Problems in the Analysis. PLoS Medicine, 4(4), 0019–0025.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free