Performance comparison of fixed, 1-, and 2-axis tracking systems for small photovoltaic systems with measured direct beam fraction

0Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The performance, and resulting economic, advantage offered by tracking systems for photovoltaic systems has not been third-party verified. Consumers are forced to rely on tracking manufacturer's claims which are up to 30% additional energy. We report on a side-by-side comparison of two nominally identical PV/microinverter systems; one at a fixed latitude tilt, and one on a 1-axis Zomeworks passive tracker. Preliminary results show the enhancement in power from 1- axis tracking over a fixed tilt varies from 5% - 20% with a strong direct beam fraction dependence. This result suggests a climatic dependence to tracking economics, which will be explored. A comprehensive analysis of system performance under a range of environmental conditions will be presented. This study was undertaken during fall 2011 at the Appalachian State University Solar Research Laboratory in Boone, NC (36° latitude), which houses a Class 1 pyranometer and pyrheliometer. PV power will be reported under well quantified irradiance conditions, including direct beam fraction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Robinson, J. W., & Raichle, B. W. (2012). Performance comparison of fixed, 1-, and 2-axis tracking systems for small photovoltaic systems with measured direct beam fraction. In World Renewable Energy Forum, WREF 2012, Including World Renewable Energy Congress XII and Colorado Renewable Energy Society (CRES) Annual Conferen (Vol. 1, pp. 177–180).

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free