Abstract
It is traditional to make the interface between an actuator and its load as stiff as possible. Despite this tradition, reducing interface stiffness offers a number of advantages, including greater shock tolerance, lower reflected inertia, more accurate and stable force control, less inadvertent damage to the environment, and the capacity for energy storage. As a trade-off, reducing interface stiffness also lowers zero motion force bandwidth. In this paper, we propose that for natural tasks, zero motion force bandwidth isn't everything, and incorporating series elasticity as a purposeful element within an actuator is a good idea. We use the term elasticity instead of compliance to indicate the presence of a passive mechanical spring in the actuator. After a discussion of the trade-offs inherent in series elastic actuators, we present a control system for their use under general force or impedance control. We conclude with test results from a revolute series-elastic actuator meant for the arms of the MIT humanoid robot Cog and for a small planetary rover.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Pratt, G. A., & Williamson, M. M. (1995). Series elastic actuators. In IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (Vol. 1, pp. 399–406). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/iros.1995.525827
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.