Structural vs. relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance

1.0kCitations
Citations of this article
1.3kReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of managers' social capital on managerial performance. Two dimensions of social capital are compared - the structural embeddedness (i.e., configuration) of a manager's network of work relations and the relational embeddedness (i.e., quality) of those relations. Based on a sample of 120 product and sales managers in a Fortune 100 pharmaceutical firm, this paper presents evidence indicating that both elements of social capital influence managerial performance, although in distinct ways: structural embeddedness plays a stronger role in explaining more routine, execution-oriented tasks (managerial sales performance), whereas relational embeddedness plays a stronger role in explaining new, innovation-oriented tasks (managerial performance in product and process innovation). This research considers resource exchanges within firms as key to value creating behaviors and contributes a deeper understanding of how social capital influences productive resource exchanges. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moran, P. (2005, December). Structural vs. relational embeddedness: Social capital and managerial performance. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.486

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free