Understanding the two components of risk attitudes: An experimental analysis

21Citations
Citations of this article
88Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Cumulative prospect theory introduced the weighting of probabilities as an additional component to capture risk attitudes. However, this addition would be a less significant challenge to expected utility theory (EU) if utility curvature and probability weighting showed strong positive correlation. In that case the utility curvature in EU alone, although not properly describing risky behavior in general, would still capture most of the variance of individual risk aversion. This study provides experimental evidence that such a strong and positive correlation does not exist. Although most individuals exhibit concave utility and convex probability weighting, the two components show no strong positive correlation. © 2011 INFORMS.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Qiu, J., & Steiger, E. M. (2011). Understanding the two components of risk attitudes: An experimental analysis. Management Science, 57(1), 193–199. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1100.1260

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free