The Ups and Downs of Attributional Ambiguity

  • Aronson J
  • Inzlicht M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This research examined whether stereotype vulnerability—the tendency to expect, perceive, and be influenced by negative stereotypes about one's social category—is associated with uncertainty about one's academic self-knowledge in two important ways. We predicted that stereotype-vulnerable African American students would (a) know less about how much they know than less vulnerable students do and (b) have unstable academic efficacy. In Study 1, Black and White participants took a verbal test and indicated the probability that each of their answers was correct. As expected, stereotype-vulnerable Black participants were more miscalibrated than other participants. In Study 2, participants completed measures of self-efficacy twice daily for 8 days. Also as expected, the academic efficacy of stereotype-vulnerable Blacks fluctuated more—and more extremely—than that of other participants. The results suggest that, in addition to undermining intellectual performance, stigma interferes with academic self-knowledge.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2004). The Ups and Downs of Attributional Ambiguity. Psychological Science, 15(12), 829–836. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00763.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free