Abstract
Background: A mapping study provides a systematic and objective procedure for identifying the nature and extent of the empirical study data that is available to answer a particular research question. Such studies can also form a useful preliminary step for PhD study. Aim:We set out to assess how effective such studies have been when used for software engineering topics, and to identify the specific challenges that they present. Method: We have conducted an informal review of a number of mapping studies in software engineering, describing their main characteristics and the forms of analysis employed. Results: We examine the experiences and outcomes from six mapping studies, of which four are published. From these we note a recurring theme about the problems of classification and a preponderance of ‘gaps’ in the set of empirical studies. Conclusions:We identify our challenges as improving classification guidelines, encouraging better reporting of primary studies, and argue for identifying some ’empirical grand challenges’ for software engineering as a focus for the community.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Budgen, D., Turner, M., Brereton, P., & Kitchenham, B. (2008). Using Mapping Studies in Software Engineering. In PPIG (Vol. 2, pp. 195–204). Retrieved from http://www.ppig.org/papers/20th-budgen.pdf
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.