Action in Aquinas

  • Kelly M
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

I USE CERTAIN TEXTS OF ST THOMAS TO SHOW THAT HE DOES NOT THINK THAT THE DIVISION OF ACTION USUALLY REFERRED TO BY SCHOLASTICS WITH PHRASES LIKE "ACTIO IMMANENS" AND "ACTIO TRANSITIVA" IS EXCLUSIVE. I SHOW FURTHERMORE THAT IT IS HIS VIEW THAT "ACTIO" REFERS PRIMARILY TO A PERFECTION WHICH REMAINS IN AN AGENT AND THAT SUCH A PERFECTION IS NEITHER ESSENTIALLY PRODUCTIVE NOR ESSENTIALLY NON-PRODUCTIVE. THE AGENTS IN HIS UNIVERSE ARE NOT LINKED TOGETHER BY NECESSARY CONNECTIONS IN VIRTUE OF THEIR ACTIONS, FOR THEIR ACTIONS ARE NEITHER ESSENTIALLY PRODUCTIVE NOR ESSENTIALLY NON-PRODUCTIVE.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kelly, M. (1978). Action in Aquinas. New Scholasticism, 52(2), 261–267. https://doi.org/10.5840/newscholas19785227

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free