Analyzing the gap between workflows and their natural language descriptions

6Citations
Citations of this article
28Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Scientists increasingly use workflows to represent and share their computational experiments. Because of their declarative nature, focus on pre-existing component composition and the availability of visual editors, workflows provide a valuable start for creating user-friendly environments for end user scientists. However, there is still work to be done to create even more user-friendly environments. In this paper, we aim to identify key constructs that intelligent workflow systems could support to allow for more natural workflow representations. These constructs are identified through a comparison of bioinformatics workflows and their associated natural language descriptions obtained from the virtual research environment myExperiment. © 2009 IEEE.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Groth, P., & Gil, Y. (2009). Analyzing the gap between workflows and their natural language descriptions. In SERVICES 2009 - 5th 2009 World Congress on Services (pp. 299–305). https://doi.org/10.1109/SERVICES-I.2009.55

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free