Application of infrared remote sensing to constrain in-situ estimates of ice crystal particle size during SPartICus

5Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In a prior paper (Cooper and Garrett, 2010), an infrared remote sensing technique was developed that quantifies the effective radius of ice crystals in cirrus clouds. By accounting for a broad range of expected inversion uncertainties, this retrieval scheme isolates those radiometric signatures that can only occur if the cirrus has nominally "small" values of e below 20 Î1/4m. The method is applicable only for specific cloud and atmospheric conditions. However, it can be particularly useful in constraining in-situ estimates of cirrus cloud e obtained from aircraft. Recent studies suggest that airborne measurements may be compromised by the shattering of ice crystals on airborne instrument inlets, so robust, independent confirmation of these measurements is needed. Here, we expand the Cooper and Garrett (2010) retrieval scheme to identify ice clouds that are likely to have "large" values of e greater than 20 m. Using MODIS observations, we then compare assessments of cirrus cloud e with in-situ measurements obtained during three test cases from the 2010 SPartICus campaign. In general, there is good agreement between retrievals and in-situ measurements for a "small" and "large" crystal case. For a more ambiguously "small" e case, the 2D-S cloud probe indicates values of e that are slightly larger than expected from infrared retrievals, possibly indicating a slight bias in the 2D-S results towards large particles. For our test cases, there is no evidence to suggest that an FSSP-100 with unmodified inlets produces measurements of e in cirrus that are strongly biased low. © 2011 Author(s).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cooper, S. J., & Garrett, T. J. (2011). Application of infrared remote sensing to constrain in-situ estimates of ice crystal particle size during SPartICus. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 4(8), 1593–1602. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-1593-2011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free