The autonomy of art in Heidegger and Schopenhauer

1Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Many recent discussions of aesthetics have suggested that a genuine dialogue between philosophy and art is impossible. This essay aims to counter such claims by arguing that philosophical thinking about art need not be either dismissive or domineering. The authors argue that a model for a productive dialogue between philosophy and art can be found by means of a comparative reading of two seemingly very different philosophies of art: those of Schopenhauer and Heidegger. The overall philosophical positions of these two thinkers are often at odds with each other. However, a careful examination of their views of art reveals a fundamental connection between art and truth, a connection that makes artworks indispensable counterparts for philosophical thinking, without at the same time undermining their autonomy. © 2009. Idealistic Studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Granik, M., & Troxell, M. (2009). The autonomy of art in Heidegger and Schopenhauer. Idealistic Studies, 39(1–3), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.5840/idstudies2009391/312

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free