Basic Words and Language Evolution

  • Wang F
  • Wang W
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Swadesh (1952, 1955) proposed using basic-word lists for his studies in glottochronology. We have used these same lists to investigate language evolution. Chen (1996) distinguished two subgroups in Swadesh's 200-word list, placing half of the words in a high rank & half in a low rank. High-rank words are more stable through time & less likely to be loanwords; borrowed elements tend to occur more frequently among low-rank words. This characteristic of the Swadesh list can be usefully exploited to distinguish lexical retentions from borrowings; this kind of tool can be particularly useful when the evolution of a language has been affected by language contact, as was the case in the development of Middle Chinese entering tones in Pekinese. Finally we compare Dolgopolsky's (1964) 15-word list, Yakhontov's 35-word list, & Swadesh, & conclude that Swadesh's (1955) 100 basic words (high rank) are best for sub-grouping Chinese dialects. 1 Figure, 3 Appendixes, 26 References. Adapted from the source document

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, F., & Wang, W. S.-Y. (2004). Basic Words and Language Evolution. Language and Linguistics, 53, 643–662.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free