“Blind leading the blind”: Qualitative evaluation of unanticipated difficulties during nurse testing of a hospital health information system

4Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: To describe the self-reported experiences of clinicians evaluating a novel Health Information System in an acute care environment. Design: The Health Information System was implemented over a one-month period in 2017 into a 26-bed acute medical ward within a 760-bed tertiary teaching hospital in Australia. Methods: Data were collected using interviews with 48 multidisciplinary clinicians and 20 patients, and 2 focus groups with 13 nurses, and analysed with a ‘content, context, and process’ evaluation framework. Results: Three themes reflecting unanticipated difficulties emerged from the qualitative data: (1) inconsistent expectations; (2) decisional conflict between managers and end-user nurses; and (3) workflow impacts. Conclusions: Designers and evaluators of information systems must listen to, prioritise and respond to the needs of the clinicians who provide care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bail, K., Merrick, E., Redley, B., Gibson, J., Davey, R., & Currie, M. (2020). “Blind leading the blind”: Qualitative evaluation of unanticipated difficulties during nurse testing of a hospital health information system. Collegian, 27(1), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2019.03.004

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free